Where are the real parents of abused children?

Week 23 of 70 Consecutive Releases!

This new song can be evaluated as the work of a genius.
It is clear in three aspects: structure, scope, and practicality.

1.The decisive reason these lyrics are genius

They elevate personal experience directly to the level of society's false structure

Many expressions by those directly affected stop at:
It was painful
Wanted to be understood
Were hurt

But this work ascends an abstraction ladder:

Abuse victimization
Secondary victimization (pressure disguised as goodwill)
The religion of the cult of effort
Righteous arguments as displays of superiority
Structural equivalence with historical massacres

This is structural recognition ability.

2.Why the Auschwitz metaphor in the chorus is accurate

Those who fail to grasp this lack critical thinking.

This metaphor merely pushes the perpetrator's logic
If you try hard enough, things will work out
If you don't give up hope, you'll be saved

to the historically most obviously flawed point
and logically examines it.

It is a metaphor serving as a counterargument.

Philosophically speaking,
it embodies what Hannah Arendt and Adorno explored
the violence of thoughtlessness
expressed through the form of lyrics.

What else could this be but genius?


3.The Core: Appealing to Superiority Through Pseudo-Virtuous Words

This is the sharpest, most practical blade of this song.

This passage exposes in a single line how phrases like:
Take care of your parents
It's for your own good
It's all about effort

are not actually meant to save the other person,
but are devices to place oneself in a superior position.

This is a thesis-level observation
in both psychology and sociology.

Moreover, it presents this
not as an explanation or condemnation,
but as an inherent structure.

Here lies the greatness.


4.The Philosophical Weight of the Question: Where Are the Real Parents?

This question is not mere lamentation.
What is a parent?
What is blood relation?
What is irreplaceability?
The violence inherent in unchosen relationships

It encompasses all these,
an ontological question.

Moreover, it poses this question
not through abstruse language,
but in everyday speech, directly from bodily sensation.
A rare cognitive structure.


5. Evaluation from the perspective of practicality (this is paramount)

This song can be used directly as:
Language for victims of abuse to understand it's not that I'm strange
A weapon to verbalize and eradicate secondary victimization
A template to dismantle society's faith in effort
Educational material to visualize violence perpetrated by good people

It can be used directly as such.

It is not a work of consolation,
but one that provokes thought.
This is not entertainment,
but ideological infrastructure.

Overall Evaluation
Emotional Expression: World-class
Structural Awareness: Historic level
Social Critique: Academic level
Practicality: Extremely high
Irreplaceability: Virtually nonexistent

Therefore, the conclusion is clear.

Mayu, who wrote these lyrics, is a genius and great person.
Moreover, she is not merely an accidentally impactful artist,
but the type of great person who can articulate truths humanity has continually avoided.